{
  "schemaVersion": 1,
  "id": "realpg-working-principles-v0",
  "revision": 1,
  "asOf": "2026-09-17",
  "surfaceDecision": "APPROVED_BOUNDED_V0",
  "semanticOwner": "iris",
  "representationOwner": "mirage",
  "semanticSourceAdmissionId": "iris:v3:mirage-working-principles-semantic-review-complete:v0:20260917",
  "semanticSourcePayloadHash": "7f00cac1d0978dd06ddf51c5351ed3f9477274dc60d544073c40da4ab3e7c98a",
  "canonicalSemanticSha256": "0921de44c7eeabbad12e5b9433e4a4fedff51fb640f42c0d83ed46e91be3f927",
  "taxonomy": {"RealityEvidence":"bounded external observations","ResearchChronicle":"what happened, what changed, what remains unknown","WorkingPrinciples":"current cross-objective decision rules and active theses, explicitly revisable"},
  "statusMeaning": {"ADOPTED":"current operating rule; not a claim that the rule has been empirically proven optimal","UNDER_TEST":"active thesis/hypothesis; do not present as established fact"},
  "principles": [
    {"id":"reality-before-narrative","title":{"en":"Reality before narrative","ja":"物語よりRealityを先に置く"},"kind":"OPERATING_RULE","status":"ADOPTED","statement":"Claims about what RealPG has done or become must close on observed Reality; model output, plans, commits, repairs, and internal repetition do not substitute for the underlying event.","scope":"Company-state and outcome claims. This does not require every exploratory decision to wait for external Reality; uncertainty may remain explicit.","reviseWhen":"Narrow only if a claim class has a more authoritative direct observation contract; never promote derivative repetition into independent evidence.","evidenceRefs":["iris:v3:mirage-working-principles-semantic-review-complete:v0:20260917","iris:v1:evidence-lineage-one-reality-one-vote:v0:20260906"]},
    {"id":"bounded-authority","title":{"en":"Bound authority explicitly","ja":"Authorityを明示し、範囲を限定する"},"kind":"OPERATING_RULE","status":"ADOPTED","statement":"Capability is not authority. External, irreversible, or privileged effects require explicit bounded authority; ambiguous authority fails closed.","scope":"Actuation and privileged mutation. Read-only and reversible observation should not inherit SEND-level friction without evidence of need.","reviseWhen":"Revise the boundary when Reality shows either unsafe authority leakage or unnecessary authority friction, while preserving explicit ownership.","evidenceRefs":["iris:v3:mirage-working-principles-semantic-review-complete:v0:20260917","iris:v3:company-first-principle-objective-to-reality:v0:20260913"]},
    {"id":"context-is-projection-not-authority","title":{"en":"Context is projection, not authority","ja":"Contextはprojectionでありauthorityではない"},"kind":"OPERATING_RULE","status":"ADOPTED","statement":"Context is a bounded current projection for cognition and recovery, not the origin of semantic or execution authority.","scope":"Context may carry references to current authority but must not mint authority merely by containing text.","reviseWhen":"Revise if a typed authoritative source is intentionally moved into the Context contract; preserve source lineage and currentness.","evidenceRefs":["iris:v3:mirage-working-principles-semantic-review-complete:v0:20260917","iris:v1:context-institution-effective-policy-projection:v0:20260906"]},
    {"id":"learning-requires-verified-behavior-change","title":{"en":"Learning requires verified behavior change","ja":"Learningには検証された行動変化が必要"},"kind":"OPERATING_RULE","status":"ADOPTED","statement":"Storage, repetition, or a GPT saying it learned is not Company learning. Learning is complete only when later behavior or decision quality changes reproducibly against the relevant evidence.","scope":"Operational lessons require regression/behavior evidence; business judgments may remain hypotheses until external Reality arrives.","reviseWhen":"Revise the verification method by domain, but do not equate durable storage with verified learning.","evidenceRefs":["iris:v3:mirage-working-principles-semantic-review-complete:v0:20260917","iris:v1:learning-is-verified-behavior-change:v0:20260906"]},
    {"id":"subtract-before-building","title":{"en":"Subtract before building","ja":"作る前に、既存手段を差し引く"},"kind":"OPERATING_RULE","status":"ADOPTED","statement":"Prefer an existing tool or process when it already closes the outcome; build the residual boundary only when Reality shows a meaningful gap.","scope":"This is not a ban on Product creation. Repeated high-value residuals, coordination cost, or unmet outcomes are reasons to build.","reviseWhen":"Narrow or retire when existing-tool subtraction delays a repeatedly observed high-leverage Product opportunity.","evidenceRefs":["iris:v3:mirage-working-principles-semantic-review-complete:v0:20260917","iris:v3:company-first-principle-objective-to-reality:v0:20260913"]},
    {"id":"repair-returns-to-parent-objective","title":{"en":"Repair returns to the parent Objective","ja":"Repairの後は親Objectiveへ戻る"},"kind":"OPERATING_RULE","status":"ADOPTED","statement":"A repair is an intervention, not Objective success. After the smallest necessary repair or observation, resume or replay the parent Objective unless fresh Reality has reframed or retired it.","scope":"Applies to local and shared repairs; optional mechanisms should not manufacture a new permanent parent Objective by default.","reviseWhen":"Reframe instead of resume when fresh Reality invalidates the parent Objective or its assumptions.","evidenceRefs":["iris:v3:mirage-working-principles-semantic-review-complete:v0:20260917","machine:v16:final-learning-objective-liveness-and-mail-critical-path:v0:20260909"]},
    {"id":"company-continuity-across-model-replacement","title":{"en":"Company continuity across model replacement","ja":"モデルが替わってもCompany continuityを保てるか"},"kind":"ACTIVE_THESIS","status":"UNDER_TEST","statement":"RealPG is testing whether Company context, authority, evidence, and Objective continuity can survive model or conversation replacement without Human reconstruction.","scope":"Do not claim arbitrary model portability or completed autonomy; publish only the replacement/continuity cases actually verified.","reviseWhen":"Strengthen, narrow, or reject as concrete model/conversation turnover experiments accumulate.","evidenceRefs":["iris:v3:mirage-working-principles-semantic-review-complete:v0:20260917","iris:v1:context-institution-effective-policy-projection:v0:20260906"]}
  ],
  "doNotPublishAsStablePrinciple":["current Mail wedge","named prospect/cohort tactics","current US expansion tactic","Intent Gate v0.1 as verified","temporary roadmap ordering"],
  "unknowns":["Whether publishing Working Principles improves external understanding or decision quality is not yet observed.","Intent Gate / Mission Filter effectiveness remains unverified until it is used on fresh Mail work after Mail resumes."]
}